|
Index
Strange
Strange Facts1
Strange Facts2
Strange Things1
Strange Things2
basic training
circles1
circles2
message
death mystery
disease awareness
game store
new lives
physical view
real facts
sweat shops
tribal
truth love |
Strange
A Method for Using Activated Carbon
Introduction
I receive many phone calls and email messages enquiring as to whether:
activated carbon is really necessary,
if it is, which type is best,
how much activated carbon to use per gallon, or some other measurement,
how to change it without stressing the system,
and how often activated carbon should be changed,
how one can tell when it should be changed (is there a test),
should anything be done to it before using it,
what differentiates a good one from a not so good one,
what is the true story on leaching of phosphates
and so on ...
Activated carbon, in its many forms, has been used for decades now in both
fresh and saltwater aquariums. It's appeal appears to be greater in
saltwater and reef aquariums because of the perceived larger amount of
pollution that is generated in such aquariums.
Granted this may very well be so, although no one has ever proven it (my own
opinion is that different types of chemical processes occur rather than more
pollution creation), but if this is indeed the case, then the protein
skimmers we use should remove a great deal of this additional undesirable
matter, as most hobbyists know. Of course, to make this process succeed,
skimmer efficiency comes into play a great deal (what type is used, is it
large enough, can it handle the bioload, it is running optimally, is the
hobbyists adjusting it when necessary, is it reliable, etc).
Some of the forms activated carbon comes in and is sold as are:
G.A.C. or granular
Pellets of various thickness and length
Rods of various length
Spheres or balls of various size
Powder (size of powder particles may vary)
Impregnated pads
Mixed with resins
Mixed with other compounds such as phosphate and silicate removers
and so on. I am sure I overlooked a few.
Are there really reasons to use GAC
Given the uncertainty about the amount of pollution generated in salt water
and in reef aquariums, and the very widespread use of foam fractionators, is
there a reason to use activated carbon in addition to what we are already
doing (and that includes using live rock, live sand, efficient skimming,
trickkle filters and other types and so on on - not all are used by every
hobbyist of course)?
I think so.
Let me try to explain why:
Whereas skimmers remove a great deal of pollution, they do not remove all
undesirable compounds,
Skimmers may not always be running at optimum levels,
Skimmers used may be too small for the bioload,
Certain breakdown components of organic material are removed by activated
carbon more efficiently,
certain pollutants are not removed by the skimmer but are by GAC or other
forms of activated carbon,
A small amount of activated carbon can make the task the foam fractionator
has to perform a little easier and more efficient,
pesticides, algaecides, etc. are removed by activated carbon and may not be
removed by protein skimming. There is not definitive study on this but
experience tends to support this.
Airborne pollutants appear to be more susceptible to removal by good quality
activated carbon than by protein skimming,
Yellowing of the water is avoided by using activated carbon (see later for
how the carbon should be used and how much of it is necesarry in my opinion
(mine only).
tar and nicotine - for those of us who are nicotine challenged (such as
myself)- are removed by activated carbon. It is not clear whether protein
skimming actually removes these and related compounds.
Observations about the use of GAC
As you can see there are many reasons and justifications for using carbon in
addition to a protein skimmer. How much should be used and whether one
should run carbon continuously are an often debated topic. I do not believe
anyone has actually come up with a definitive answer (as is the case for so
many areas of this hobby). All we can do as hobbyists is go by our personal
experiences and what other input we get from hobbyists who do use activated
carbon. At least we have some anecdotal evidence that using carbon has
benefits although no scientific proof.
When enough anecdotal and positive evidence of benefits exists though, one
(including myself) will have a tendency to take that evidence that carbon
does indeed benefit the tank. This is a normal reaction and one that we rely
on for many of the things we do to our aquariums.
Whenever enough hobbyists report good results with a certain technique or
product, other hobbyists will start adopting that technique or will start to
use that product too.
A good example of this would be the use and benefits of Vitamin C. I have
been writing about it for years and years and have recommended it and still
do for many a problem. As the experiences of hobbyists who had positive
results were more widely reported, yet more hobbyists started ordering our
Vitamin C and then started to report similar positive results.
Even though at this stage there is no scientific explanation of the kinetics
of Vitamin C in aquariums, the number of positive experiences is now so
large that many hobbyists are finally convinced that C can be used
beneficially as a water additive and not just as a food supplement.
The same applies to the use of activated carbon. No one can really prove
that is it beneficial, but observing tanks on which it is used and tanks on
which it is not, and then making comparisons, leads to the conclusion that
using some amounts of carbon is indeed beneficial.
What has changed over time, especially in reef tanks, and to some extent in
fish-only tanks, is the recommendations regarding quantity. Whereas a few
years ago, more was better, it now appears that hobbyists are more cautious
and use far less activated carbon than they did before. The main concern is
depletion of beneficial nutrients and the possible onset of lateral line
disease if too much carbon is used for too long.
Whereas no concensus exists on how much carbon should be used, what appears
to be the trend nowadays is a shift from using a large amount continuously,
to using smaller amounts and using them intermittently not continuously.
That is what I personally now do and recommend.
How much GAC should one Use
The amount that I have found to be sufficient in
reefs is:
about 3 level tablespoons per 50 gallons of actual water
ran once a week, for approximately 12 hours
I then remove the carbon, spread it out in a shallow tray and let it dry out
one week later I use it again for 12 hours
I change the carbon based on the carbon yellowing test results (see below)
I also maintain a 5 ppm Vitamin C concentration in the tank at all times
I add Vital Gold every day (based on product label recommendations)
all other supplements needed for reefs are added as required
in fish-only aquariums:
about 3 levels tablespoons per 50 gallons of actual water
ran twice a week for 18 hours
the same is the done as described above with regard to drying and changing
the carbon
Vitamin C is ran at 5 ppm and the necessary amount is added every day
A complete supplement is added as per label instructions
Additional Useful Information
The type of carbon I use is pelletized vegetable base carbon, treated for
use in salt water (also refered to as Cocunut shell).
I use the carbon yellowing test (TAT brand - which I believe is the only
company that makes one). This is a piece of acrylic that has yellow marks on
it. I immerse it in the tank and if I can see the yellow marks I know the
carbon is still working fine. If I cannot see the yellow marks I know that
the carbon needs to replaced. The reason for this is that this indicates an
increase in yellowing matter (Gilvin) in the water, preventing me from
seeing the yellow marks. When such an increase occurs, the activated carbon
is no longer removing albumin and yellowing matter and is thus for all
practical purposes, spent and needs to be be replaced.
This is the only way I know of testing the carbon that is simple and
extremely fast. There are other methods but they are more elaborate and
require more expensive tests. The carbon yellowing test is reusable over and
over again and does not require more than a minute or so to perform. The
test is very inexpensive as well.
Using large amounts of fresh carbon at once changes the water chemistry
rapidly in my experience. Rapid depletion of oxygen can occur especially if
the better brands are used. This can be overcome by pre-treating the carbon.
Soak it in tepid water for about 20 or so minutes and then it should be
ready to be added to your aquarium. Do not use large amounts though (see
above).
Should you force the water through the carbon or should you just let it flow
by and over the carbon? Various authors differ on this subject and no
conclusive tests have demonstrated which one of the two is actually the
beter method. Using caution by not overusing carbon is probably the better
route to go until more is known about exactly happens in both instances.
Pre-treating the carbon though, as described, should solve the rapid change
in water chemistry.
Does carbon remove too many desirable elements? It certainly can and one
should add a complete additive to the aquarium to counteract this. There are
several on the market that are made for reefs and that have been improved
over the years. Those are the ones that I would opt to use.
Phosphate Leaching
What is the truth on phosphate leachings? All carbon leaches "some"
phosphate. That is its nature. All carbon removes iodine as well so using
too much of it will deplete your iodine and will add some PO4 to the tank.
The better brands of carbon though leach so little phosphate that once it is
diluted in the aquarium the actual levels will be so low that they will be
well within the ranges recommended (low PO4 level e.g. around 0.03 ppm).
There are no carbons that do not leach any phosphates in the tank. The
answer is to use a high quality brand that leaches very very little PO4. You
can test what amount is given off by the brand you use by adding 1 tsp to a
gallon of water, letting it sit for about 30/45 minutes and then testing for
phosphate.
After you come up with a result, extrapolate and calculate how much that
would represent as a concentration for your tank, and if that amount is real
low (say 0.01 or 0.02 ppm) you have a carbon that is of excellent quality.
Search
Engine Optimization Company National
Fitness Equipments Pharmaceutical Product Google
blog Collection
of Books Live
in nanny Nigerian
Spam We
buy houses Property auction
|
